Ipod Phase Gameplay

  • Length: 4:31
  • Rating: ( ratings)
  • Views: 3
  • Author: NashvilleGamerz

Tags: ipod  music  phase 

Phase GameplayRecorded by xPROxIMPORTx56x

Psychedelic Rock Celebration, Tom Hock - Aalen

  • Length: 4:12
  • Rating: 5.00 (2 ratings)
  • Views: 223
  • Author: bluesandall

Tags: Aalen  Airplane  Amon  Beck  Blues  Boss  Clapton  Davis  Dead  Düll  Eric  Finkenwerder  Floyd  GB  Gibson-S1  Gimme  Grateful  Hamburg  Hendrix  in  Jeff  Jefferson  Jimi  JVC-GR-D345E  Krautrock  London  Loving  Marshall-JCM800  ME-50  Moody  Music  New  Nights  Orleans  Pink  Psychedelic  R&B  Reverent-H  RHB-Fest  Rock  Satin  Sixties  Some  Spencer  Steve  USA  Wild  Winwood 

Reverent H. Band celebrated 30 Years of Psychedelic Blues-Rock. The band comes from the area of Laupheim and exercises in Burgrieden.Location / Date: Langenau -- Stetzingen / Lonetal -- Free Live Music and Free Camping Open Air -- on 02./03.08.2008. Get the feeling of a smelly and crunchy mini Woodstock. We watched nothing around apart from Autobahn A7 in some distance. A continuous working 40 KVA diesel generators guarantee noisy performances.Tom's Rock part: Intro in e -- Solo (in E) -- Ending Gimme Some Loving -- Fading Solo in e ending (from Nights in wild Satin). Hope you get a little psychedelic German country side feeling with a strange Rock feeling.Session musician: Tom Hock (vocal, guitar, harp), Jens Jedelhauser (drums), The Voyager (bass) Tom plays in Tom Hock Band, Alcatraz (Jan Rieck) and Tom Hock & the DrinkersJens & The Voyager play in: The`O`. Tom Hock is proud to introduce you to his kind of playing guitar solo. Guitar: Gibson S1 which only uses single coils. Similar to Fender's Telecaster & Stratocaster.Amp: an old Marshall -- standing around Effect: Boss ME-50 (Guitar Multiple Effects) Basis of used patches 1. Sound with Delay (Intro)2. Solid drive sound with adding wah effect in different position of the pedal (Solo)3. Crunch sound with additional rough distortion (Ending Gimme Some Loving)4. Drive sound with adding wah effect in different position of the pedal (Ending)Bluesharp: Hohner A.Remember the great psychedelic music phase in the sixties especially in USA (and GB e.g. early Pink Floyd). For me the most exciting performance was Jefferson Airplane (US-Band) in Hamburg (1968) -- Musikhalle with their fantastic light show. Self-made productionRecorded with Camcorder JVC GR-D345EPostproduction: Heiko Enzinger (www.ensonique.de).Sound: take it like it is or try to improve. Thanks to Reverent H. Band and The Voyager for giving the possibility for this great experience.

Psychedelic Blues-Rock Celebration, Tom Hock - Aalen

  • Length: 3:20
  • Rating: 5.00 (3 ratings)
  • Views: 373
  • Author: bluesandall

Tags: Aalen  Airplane  AllYourLoving  B.B.  Beck  Black  Blues  Boss  Buddy  Clapton  Dixon  Eric  Finkenwerder  GB  Gibson-S1  Grace  Guy  Hamburg  Hendrix  Hooker  Janis  JCM800  Jeff  Jefferson  Jimi  John-Lee  Joplin  JVC-GR-D345E  King  Kozmic  Krautrock  Langenau  Laupheim  Marshall  ME-50  Monday  Music  New  Orleans  Psychedelic  Reverent-H  RHB-Fest  Rock  Roots  Sixties  Slick  Stormy  T-Bone  USA  Walker 

Reverent H. Band celebrated 30 Years of Psychedelic Blues-rock. The band comes from the area of Laupheim and exercises in Burgrieden.Location / Date: Langenau -- Stetzingen / Lonetal -- Free Live Music and Free Camping Open Air -- on 02./03.08.2008. Get the feeling of a smelly and crunchy mini Woodstock. We watched nothing around apart from Autobahn A7 in some distance. A continuous working 40 KVA diesel generators guarantee noisy performances.Tom's Blues part: Blues intro in A (to All Your Loving from Dixon) -- Solo (Blues in G) -- Ending of Stormy Monday from T. B. Walker -- Fading Blues Ending. Hope you get a little psychedelic German country side feeling with a soft breath of voodoo.Session musician: Tom Hock (vocal, guitar, harp), Jens Jedelhauser (drums), The Voyager (bass) Tom plays in Tom Hock Band, Alcatraz (Jan Rieck) and Tom Hock & the DrinkersJens & The Voyager play in: The`O`. Tom Hock is proud to introduce you to his kind of playing guitar solo. Guitar: Gibson S1 which only uses single coils. Similar to Fender's Telecaster & Stratocaster.Amp: an old Marshall -- standing aroundEffect: Boss ME-50 (Guitar Multiple Effects) Basis of used patches 1. Organ style using ROTARY effect (Blues Intro in A)2. Crunch sound with additional rough distortion (Solo part1 - Blues in G)3. Solid drive sound with adding wah effect in different position of the pedal (Solo part2 - Blues in G)4. Back to 1. (Ending of Stormy Monday)5. Back to 1. (Fading Blues Ending in A)Bluesharp: Hohner D and C.Remember the great psychedelic music phase in the sixties especially in USA (and in GB e.g. remember early Pink Floyd). For me the most exciting performance was Jefferson Airplane (US-Band) in Hamburg (1968) -- Musikhalle with their fantastic light show.I like to dedicate this to Grace Slick. Remember also Grateful Dead, Big Brother and the Holding Company, unforgettable Janis Joplin.I like to dedicate this also to the early Blues musicians like Bukka White. Let's go back to roots of popular music in New Orleans (please survive) and Mississippi plus Delta.Self-made productionAudio and video was recorded with Camcorder JVC GR-D345E. Postproduction done by Heiko Enzinger (www.ensonique.de).Sound: take it like it is or try to improve. Thanks to Referent H. Band and The Voyager for giving the possibility for this great experience.

Markan Priority featuring Pastor Eman Laerton

  • Length: 1:30
  • Rating: 4.50 (4 ratings)
  • Views: 239' favoriteCount='1
  • Author: EmanLaerton

Tags: atheist  Bart  Christian  Christianity  Dawkins  Ehrman  Gospel  Jesus  John  Luke  Matthew  New  Richard  secular  Testament 

p. 85-86 The New Testament: a Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings / Bart EhrmanFor the past century or so, three arguments have proved widely convincing for establishing Mark's priority to Matthew and Luke:Patterns of Agreement. Since the main reason for thinking that the Gospels share a common source is their verbatim agreements, it makes sense to examine the nature of these agreements in order to decide which of the books was used by the other two. If you were to make a detailed comparison of the word-for-word agreements among these Gospels, an interesting pattern would emerge. Sometimes all three of the Gospels tell a story in precisely the same way. This can easily be accounted for; it would happen whenever two of the authors borrowed their account from the earliest one, and neither of them changed it. Sometimes all three Gospels differ. This would happen whenever the two authors who borrowed each changed it, in different ways. Finally, sometimes two of the three are exactly alike, but the third differs. This would occur when both of the later authors borrowed the story but only one of them changed it; in this case one of the redactors would agree with the wording of his source, and the other would not.In this final kind of situation, certain patterns of agreement typically occur among the Synoptic Gospels. Sometimes Matthew and Mark share the wording of a story when Luke differs, and sometimes Mark and Luke share the wording when Matthews differs. But it is extremely rare to find Matthew and Luke sharing the wording of a story also found in Mark when Mark differs. Why would this be?If Matthew were the source for Mark and Luke, or if Luke were the source for Matthew and Mark, you would probably not get this pattern. Consider these examples. If both Matthew and Luke used Mark, then sometimes they would both reproduce the same wording. That's why all three sometimes agree. Sometimes they would both change the wording for reasons of their own. That's why all three sometimes differ. Sometimes Matthew would change Mark's account when Luke left it the same. That's why Mark and Luke sometimes agree against Matthew. And sometimes Luke would change Mark's account when Matthew left it the same. That's why Matthew and Mark sometimes agree against Luke.The reason then that Matthew and Luke rarely agree against Mark in the wording of stories found in all three is that Mark is the source for these stories. Unless Matthew and Luke accidentally happen to make precisely the same changes in their source (which does happen on occasion, but not commonly and not in major ways), they cannot both differ from the source and agree with one another. The fact that they rarely do differ from Mark while agreeing with one another indicates that Mark must have been their source.More:http://www.churchacrossamerica.com/lesson3_studyguide.php#blackboard

Page: 1 of 5

Next Page